Three of fourteen models named HackerRank first on the direct prompt; one named Coderbyte. HackerRank was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Coderbyte by twelve and HackerRank carries 64 labels and Coderbyte 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, HackerRank and Coderbyte were named in the same answer sixty-seven times, of the 271 answers naming HackerRank and the 82 naming Coderbyte. In those answers Coderbyte took the first choice twenty-four times and HackerRank ten.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“LeetCode-style algorithm challenge platforms (e.g., HackerRank, Codility, CodeSignal): While widely used, these are often criticized for not reflecting real-world job tasks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“HackerRank – Low Trustpilot score, no refund policy, no debugger, unreliable AI scoring.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Codility/HackerRank ($150\u2013$249+/mo) unless scaling up.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“used by 40% of Fortune 100 companies and is known for coding challenges, real-world project assessments... making it unmatched for engineering hiring” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose HackerRank or Codility if you are an enterprise needing rigorous automated screening with ironclad proctoring” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“HackerRank if you are a large company hiring hundreds of developers and need a standardized process.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Frequently called out as one of the worst by candidates due to bugs ... "riddled with bugs"” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some platforms (like Coderbyte) have cheap base prices but charge add-ons for proctoring” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best for Regular Hiring: Coderbyte ... unlimited plan offers the best value.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“For a small company watching cash flow, I'd start with Coderbyte's monthly plan.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“Coderbyte stands out as one of the best coding assessment platforms” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.