AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Technical hiring assessm › HackerRank vs Coderbyte
Technical hiring assessments · October 2026 Edition

HackerRank vs Coderbyte

Three of fourteen models named HackerRank first on the direct prompt; one named Coderbyte. HackerRank was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Coderbyte by twelve and HackerRank carries 64 labels and Coderbyte 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HackerRank

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

Coderbyte

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share17%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels6422A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HackerRank reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CodeSignal was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. HackerRank vs CodeSignal · HackerRank vs CoderPad · HackerRank vs TestGorilla

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HackerRankFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCoderbyte
Direct31
Paraphrase40
Comparative110
Budget-constrained152 against HackerRank · 1 against Coderbyte
Scale-constrained20
Negative0112 against HackerRank · 1 against Coderbyte
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, HackerRank and Coderbyte were named in the same answer sixty-seven times, of the 271 answers naming HackerRank and the 82 naming Coderbyte. In those answers Coderbyte took the first choice twenty-four times and HackerRank ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HackerRank and Coderbyte stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
HackerRank Coderbyte first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HackerRank on the left and Coderbyte on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HackerRank and Coderbyte stood in it.

HackerRank first, Coderbyte an alternative

3 of 14 modelsCoderbyte was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, Codility
Grok 4.1 FastHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Codility
Muse Glimmer 30BCodeSignal, DevSkiller, HackerRank alternatives: Codility

Coderbyte first, HackerRank an alternative

1 of 14 modelsHackerRank was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Coderbyte alternatives: HackerRank, TestGorilla

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarCodeSignal alternatives: Coderbyte, DevSkiller
Mistral SmallGoodfit alternatives: HackerRank
DeepSeek V4 FlashCodility alternatives: CodeSignal, HackerRank
Llama 4 MaverickGoodfit alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
GLM 4.7 FlashXCodility, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
MiniMax M2.5Codility alternatives: AssessHub, CoderPad, HackerRank
GPT-6 LunaCodeSignal Hire Grow alternatives: CoderPad, HackerRank

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5HackerEarth, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal
Gemini 3.5 FlashCoderPad, Woven alternatives: CodeSignal
Qwen 3.7 FlashCodeSignal alternatives: CoderPad, Codility, TestGorilla, Voomer

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Coderbyte leads by ten points.
Coderbyte22%#1 of 8
HackerRank12%#4 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: HackerRank leads at mid-market.
HackerRank17%#1 of 9
Coderbyte10%#4 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
HackerRank leads by thirty-three points.
HackerRank51%#1 of 8
Coderbyte18%#2 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HackerRank

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“LeetCode-style algorithm challenge platforms (e.g., HackerRank, Codility, CodeSignal): While widely used, these are often criticized for not reflecting real-world job tasks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“HackerRank – Low Trustpilot score, no refund policy, no debugger, unreliable AI scoring.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Codility/HackerRank ($150\u2013$249+/mo) unless scaling up.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“used by 40% of Fortune 100 companies and is known for coding challenges, real-world project assessments... making it unmatched for engineering hiring” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose HackerRank or Codility if you are an enterprise needing rigorous automated screening with ironclad proctoring” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“HackerRank if you are a large company hiring hundreds of developers and need a standardized process.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Coderbyte

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Frequently called out as one of the worst by candidates due to bugs ... "riddled with bugs"” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some platforms (like Coderbyte) have cheap base prices but charge add-ons for proctoring” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best for Regular Hiring: Coderbyte ... unlimited plan offers the best value.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“For a small company watching cash flow, I'd start with Coderbyte's monthly plan.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“Coderbyte stands out as one of the best coding assessment platforms” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.