Zero of fourteen models named BackgroundChecks.com first on the direct prompt; two named Accurate Background. BackgroundChecks.com was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Accurate Background by fourteen and BackgroundChecks.com carries 20 labels and Accurate Background 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the background screening page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, BackgroundChecks.com and Accurate Background were named in the same answer twenty-three times, of the 60 answers naming BackgroundChecks.com and the 91 naming Accurate Background. In those answers Accurate Background took the first choice zero times and BackgroundChecks.com six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“multiple customer reviews label it a "scam," citing canceled accounts after payment without delivering reports” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Complaints about randomly locking users out of accounts” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the tightest budget, BackgroundChecks.com appears to offer the lowest entry point at $24.99 per basic report with no contracts or fees.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best background check provider for a company with a limited budget is BackgroundChecks.com, which offers a pay-as-you-go screening service” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“BackgroundChecks.com, Certn, and HireShield are recommended for lighter, pay-as-you-go needs” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Trustpilot reviews describe it as "the worst company" with reports taking months” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“rely on automated systems to match records, and this process can result in inaccurate or misleading reports” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Multiple negative reviews about extremely long wait times (sometimes over a month)” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“My top recommendation for most mid-market B2B companies: Accurate Background” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Accurate Background is best for mid-market employers across multiple industries” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Accurate Background - for mid-market companies that need background screening bundled with drug testing and occupational health services.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.