Workable vs Greenhouse
Seven of fourteen models named Workable first on the direct prompt; four named Greenhouse. Both were named by all fourteen models and both carry 26 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Named in thirteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI recruiting assistants page.
By framing
WorkableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGreenhouse
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Workable and Greenhouse were named in the same answer 129 times, of the 327 answers naming Workable and the 454 naming Greenhouse. In those answers Greenhouse took the first choice thirty times and Workable nineteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Workable Greenhouse first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workable on the left and Greenhouse on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Workable first, Greenhouse an alternative
5 of 14 modelsGreenhouse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Greenhouse first, Workable an alternative
2 of 14 modelsWorkable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Workable14%#3 of 9Greenhouse0%#– of 9Workable22%#2 of 15Greenhouse10%#3 of 15What the models said about Workable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“significantly cheaper than enterprise competitors like Workable (which starts around $299/month)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“All-in-one mid-market pick: Workable – AI-assisted all-in-one ... the most popular all-in-one option at this price tier” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“lists HireVue among the companies under investigation for potentially providing consumer reports without adhering to FCRA requirements, alongside Workday, Greenhouse, Lever By Employ, Ashby” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest starting with Workable if you want transparent pricing ... or Greenhouse if you're willing to invest more in a structured hiring process” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.