# Qualtrics 360 Development: how AI models rank it, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 9 judge labels across 1 categories by 6 of 14 models. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/vendors/qualtrics-360-development/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360 feedback | 0% | 18 | 11% | 9 |

## What the models said for it

- "Best for: Large enterprise organizations requiring massive scale, complex rater hierarchies, and advanced analytics." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, 360 feedback)
- "Research-grade analytics; strongest text analytics and statistical depth; enterprise scale." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, 360 feedback)
- "Best for: Large enterprises needing standardized 360 cycles with cohort-level reporting" (MiniMax M2.5, 360 feedback)
- "Best for: Sophisticated survey logic and enterprise listening" (Kimi K2, 360 feedback)

## And against it

- "Qualtrics doesn't offer a full suite of performance management tools and pricing can be high for smaller companies." (Claude Haiku 4.5, 360 feedback)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 13 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- 360 feedback: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 13 points · rank 19 → 18 of 73.

## In its own words

What Qualtrics 360 Development's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: 効果の見える具体的なマネジャー・アクションをクアルトリクスのエンゲージメント調査と360評価で実現！ (https://learn.qualtrics.com/ja-360-development-webinar)
- For: EX担当者様 (https://learn.qualtrics.com/ja-360-development-webinar)

## Record

- Method: https://hr-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://hr-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, hr-ai-index.com.