# Pingboard: how AI models rank it, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 36 judge labels across 1 categories by 13 of 14 models. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/vendors/pingboard/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | 8% | 4 | 8% | 36 |

## What the models said for it

- "Pingboard is frequently picked for growing and mid-size orgs that need governable org-chart changes with admin workflows and integrations." (Muse Glimmer 30B, Org charts)
- "Go with Pingboard if you want the best balance of automation, employee experience, and reasonable pricing" (Kimi K2, Org charts)
- "Pingboard (often rated best overall for mid-market)" (Grok 4.1 Fast, Org charts)
- "OrgChartHub and Pingboard are top choices" (Mistral Small, Org charts)

## And against it

- "Avoid per-employee pricing models (like ChartHop or Pingboard) if you're budget-constrained" (Kimi K2, Org charts)
- "Clunky org chart interface — users describe it as "a little hairy" with multiple team members" (Kimi K2, Org charts)
- "Be cautious about: Pingboard (and similar mid-tier tools with manual quirks)" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Org charts)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 13 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- Org charts and org design: 4% to 8%, +3. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 7 → 4 of 95.

## In its own words

What Pingboard's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: a cloud-based org chart and employee directory solution (https://pingboard.com/)
- For: organizations with hybrid, remote, or distributed teams (https://pingboard.com/)
- Integrations claimed: 100 (https://pingboard.com/)

## What it publishes

Every page pingboard.com exposes, read 2026-09-29: 979 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 395 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-21
- case study: 42 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- webinar or virtual event: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-02-05
- conference or event: 29 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-06-26
- report or ebook: 26 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-03-01
- comparison: 17 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-10-03
- template or tool: 62 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-09-18
- glossary or explainer: 28 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-03-17
- podcast or video: 6 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- news or press: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- Recent: 2026-07-21 blog: Employee recognition messages examples https://workleap.com/blog/employee-recognition-messages-examples
- Recent: 2026-04-03 blog: Remote employee engagement https://workleap.com/blog/remote-employee-engagement
- Recent: 2026-03-17 glossary or explainer: What is compensation survey https://workleap.com/blog/what-is-compensation-survey
- Recent: 2026-03-17 glossary or explainer: What is flexible compensation https://workleap.com/blog/what-is-flexible-compensation
- Recent: 2026-03-01 report or ebook: Meeting framework https://workleap.com/ebooks/meeting-framework
- Recent: 2026-02-23 report or ebook: Compensation can be your biggest cost and asset https://workleap.com/ebooks/compensation-can-be-your-biggest-cost-and-asset

## Record

- Method: https://hr-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://hr-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, hr-ai-index.com.