# Lucidchart: how AI models rank it, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 57 judge labels across 1 categories by 14 of 14 models. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/vendors/lucidchart/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Org charts and org design | 2% | 9 | 39% | 57 |

## What the models said for it

- "Org Chart Software (like Lucidchart, OrgChart, or Miro) - Best for visualizing hierarchy, roles, and reporting relationships." (Claude Haiku 4.5, Org charts)
- "Lucidchart is a strong all-around choice for org charts as part of a broader diagramming suite" (Perplexity Sonar, Org charts)
- "Lucidchart – well-rounded diagramming ... Diagram + collaboration beyond orgs: Lucidchart" (Muse Glimmer 30B, Org charts)
- "If you want flexibility and multi-purpose diagramming, choose Lucidchart or Visio." (Mistral Small, Org charts)

## And against it

- "Static diagramming tools such as Lucidchart, Miro, Creately, SmartDraw, Visio, PowerPoint, Excel, and Word when they are used as the primary org-chart system" (Perplexity Sonar, Org charts)
- "static diagramming tools (like Lucidchart, Miro, or Visio) fail because manual updates quickly become a bottleneck" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Org charts)
- "Lucidchart specifically — users note it's "expensive, locked behind seats, and overkill"" (Kimi K2, Org charts)
- "*Why avoid:* While they can import data, they are fundamentally static vector canvases." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Org charts)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 13 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- Org charts and org design: 6% to 2%, −4. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 6 → 9 of 95.

## In its own words

What Lucidchart's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Intelligent diagramming (https://lucid.co/)
- For: teams (https://trust.lucid.co)
- Price stated: Pricing (https://lucid.co/)
- Free plan or trial: Sign up free (https://lucid.co/)
- Integrations claimed: 100 (https://lucid.co/)
- Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, CSA, FedRAMP Moderate, TX-RAMP, ISO 27001, FedRAMP Authorized
- Customers named: Google, GE, NBC Universal, Docusign, Ping Identity, TV 2 DANMARK, Western Union, Flybuys Australia Limited

## What it publishes

Every page lucid.co exposes, read 2026-09-29: 10011 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 1625 pages, 7 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-24
- case study: 64 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- webinar or virtual event: 56 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-02-06
- conference or event: 18 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-01
- report or ebook: 15 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- comparison: 80 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-03-18
- template or tool: 513 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-02-04
- glossary or explainer: 88 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-10
- news or press: 3 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- Recent: 2026-09-24 blog: Scaling ai playbook https://lucid.co/blog/scaling-ai-playbook
- Recent: 2026-09-16 blog: Capabilities tech teams need from a visual collaboration solution https://lucid.co/blog/capabilities-tech-teams-need-from-a-visual-collaboration-solution
- Recent: 2026-09-15 blog: Security teams AI adoption https://lucid.co/blog/security-teams-AI-adoption
- Recent: 2026-09-10 glossary or explainer: What is cloud sprawl https://lucid.co/blog/what-is-cloud-sprawl
- Recent: 2026-09-08 blog: Ai solutions for business challenges https://lucid.co/blog/ai-solutions-for-business-challenges
- Recent: 2026-09-03 blog: The biggest signs and risks of collaboration tech sprawl https://lucid.co/blog/signs-and-risks-of-collaboration-tech-sprawl

## Record

- Method: https://hr-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://hr-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, hr-ai-index.com.