# iMocha: how AI models rank it, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition. Named in 31 judge labels across 4 categories by 12 of 14 models. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/vendors/imocha/

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skills intelligence | 9% | 3 | 5% | 19 |
| Candidate assessment | 0% | 19 | 0% | 6 |
| Technical hiring assessments | 0% | 25 | 20% | 5 |
| Succession planning | 0% | 62 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "look at Degreed, 360Learning, Cornerstone, iMocha, or Acorn; ... if you want skills verification, look at iMocha" (Perplexity Sonar, Skills intelligence)
- "combined with iMocha or Textkernel Skills Intelligence API for inference capabilities" (Grok 4.1 Fast, Skills intelligence)
- "I'd recommend starting with iMocha ... Best all-around choice: iMocha" (GPT-5.4 mini, Skills intelligence)
- "1. iMocha (Best for Verified Skills & B2B Tech/Professional Services)" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Skills intelligence)

## And against it

- "Candidates sometimes describe the interface as dated or non-intuitive, leading to high drop-off rates" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Technical hiring assessm)
- "overkill and cost-prohibitive for most mid-sized B2B firms" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Skills intelligence)

## Movement since September 2026

Floor: 13 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise.

- Candidate assessment: 2% to 0%, −2. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 5 → 19 of 118.
- Skills intelligence: 9% to 9%, +2. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 3 of 127, unchanged.
- Technical hiring assessments: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 13 points · rank 35 → 25 of 71.
- Succession planning: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 13 points · rank 75 → 62 of 93.

## In its own words

What iMocha's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Skills and Work Intelligence Platform (https://imocha.io/)
- For: enterprises (https://imocha.io/)
- Integrations claimed: 3 (https://www.imocha.io/platform/ai-logicbox)
- Certifications: SOC 2 TYPE II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR
- Customers named: L’Oréal, PMI, Capgemini, Ericsson, Microsoft, Flipkart, WFP, EY

## What it publishes

Every page imocha.io exposes, read 2026-09-29: 3099 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 810 pages, 12 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-24
- case study: 94 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- webinar or virtual event: 10 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2023-12-22
- report or ebook: 69 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- comparison: 124 pages, 5 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-17
- template or tool: 2 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-24
- glossary or explainer: 55 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2023-08-17
- podcast or video: 4 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- news or press: 51 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- Recent: 2026-09-24 blog: Cost of skills gap for cfo https://www.imocha.io/blog/cost-of-skills-gap-for-cfo
- Recent: 2026-09-23 blog: Impact of ld budget cuts on workforce capability https://www.imocha.io/blog/impact-of-ld-budget-cuts-on-workforce-capability
- Recent: 2026-09-17 comparison: Skills taxonomy vs skills ontology https://www.imocha.io/blog/skills-taxonomy-vs-skills-ontology
- Recent: 2026-09-16 comparison: Skill gap analysis vs skills intelligence platforms https://www.imocha.io/blog/skill-gap-analysis-vs-skills-intelligence-platforms
- Recent: 2026-09-11 comparison: Phenom alternatives competitors https://www.imocha.io/blog/phenom-alternatives-competitors
- Recent: 2026-09-11 comparison: Gloat alternatives competitors https://www.imocha.io/blog/gloat-alternatives-competitors

## Record

- Method: https://hr-ai-index.com/methodology/
- Raw judge labels and full responses: https://hr-ai-index.com/data/
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, hr-ai-index.com.