# Greenhouse vs Workable: which do AI models recommend for applicant tracking syste, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Applicant tracking systems. Twelve of fourteen models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; zero named Workable. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/talent/applicant-tracking-systems/greenhouse-vs-workable/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse | 40% | #1 of 15 | 4% | 55 | 14 of 14 |
| Workable | 9% | #4 of 15 | 8% | 37 | 14 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Claude Haiku 4.5: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Ashby, Lever, Pinpoint, Workable)
- GPT-5.4 mini: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Ashby, Lever)
- Perplexity Sonar: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Gem, Jobvite, Lever, Workable)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Lever, Workable)
- Mistral Small: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse, Pinpoint) (alternatives: Ceipal, JazzHR, iCIMS)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Ashby, Lever)
- Llama 4 Maverick: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: JazzHR, iCIMS)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Ashby, Lever)
- Kimi K2: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR, JazzHR, Lever, Paycor, Workable)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Lever, Rippling, Workable)
- MiniMax M2.5: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse, Lever) (alternatives: Bullhorn, Workable)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: greenhouse first (first choices: Greenhouse) (alternatives: Lever)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: neither first, one named (first choices: Ashby) (alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint, Teamtailor)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither first, one named (first choices: Ashby) (alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever)

## What the models said about Greenhouse

- "pick a structured, recruiting-first platform like Greenhouse or iCIMS when consistency, reporting and hiring manager adoption are priorities" (Muse Glimmer 30B, comparative prompt, first choice)
- "Ranked #1 ATS on G2's Winter 2026 reports across Overall, Enterprise, Mid-Market, and EMEA categories with a 98% user satisfaction rate" (Claude Haiku 4.5, direct prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Workable

- "Considerations: Higher entry price; per‑seat or tiered pricing as you scale." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "costs a fraction of enterprise tools like Workable or Greenhouse" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Workable is a top mid-market choice for teams that need full ATS functionality without enterprise complexity, starting at $299/month flat." (Llama 4 Maverick, paraphrase prompt, first choice)
- "I'd lean toward Workable as a strong starting point due to its transparent pricing, fast implementation, and robust AI features" (Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.