# PayAnalytics vs Aeqium: which do AI models recommend for pay equity, October 2026

HR AI Recommendation Index, October 2026 Edition, Pay equity. Four of fourteen models named PayAnalytics first on the direct prompt; two named Aeqium. Page: https://hr-ai-index.com/rewards/pay-equity/payanalytics-vs-aeqium/

| | First-choice share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Models naming it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PayAnalytics | 12% | #2 of 14 | 4% | 24 | 11 of 14 |
| Aeqium | 4% | #8 of 14 | 17% | 12 | 9 of 14 |

## The direct prompt, model by model

- Gemini 3.5 Flash: payanalytics first (first choices: PayAnalytics) (alternatives: CandorIQ, Pequity, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity)
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: payanalytics first (first choices: PayAnalytics) (alternatives: Compport, Payscale, Syndio)
- Kimi K2: payanalytics first (first choices: PayAnalytics, Syndio) (alternatives: Payscale, Trusaic PayParity)
- Muse Glimmer 30B: payanalytics first (first choices: PayAnalytics, beqom Pay Equity) (alternatives: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity)
- Perplexity Sonar: aeqium first (first choices: Aeqium) (alternatives: HiBob, Payscale, Salary.com Pay Equity, Workleap Compensation)
- Mistral Small: aeqium first (first choices: Aeqium) (alternatives: Sysarb, Workleap Compensation)
- Claude Haiku 4.5: neither first, one named (first choices: Workleap Compensation) (alternatives: Compport, OpenComp, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Syndio, Trusaic PayParity)
- GPT-5.4 mini: neither first, one named (first choices: Syndio) (alternatives: PayAnalytics, Trusaic PayParity)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: neither first, one named (first choices: Workleap Compensation) (alternatives: Aeqium, HiBob, Payscale)
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: neither first, one named (first choices: Syndio) (alternatives: Aeqium, Affirmity, Compport, Figures, HiBob, Pave, PayAnalytics, Payscale, Workday Pay Equity, beqom Pay Equity)
- MiniMax M2.5: neither first, one named (first choices: HiBob) (alternatives: Aeqium, Pave, Payscale, Workleap Compensation)
- Llama 4 Maverick: neither named (first choices: Workleap Compensation) (alternatives: Affirmity, Effy)
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: neither named (first choices: Pave) (alternatives: Payscale, Phodata, Workleap Compensation)
- GPT-6 Luna: neither named (first choices: Payscale) (alternatives: Syndio, Trusaic PayParity)

## What the models said about PayAnalytics

- "usually more enterprise-oriented and demo-based, so likely less budget-friendly" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "Best Overall for Mid-Market Analytics: PayAnalytics (by beqom) ... widely considered the gold standard for the mid-market" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Opt for robust platforms like Syndio, Trusaic, or PayAnalytics with regression analysis, PAG grouping, and remediation sims" (Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt, first choice)
- "PayAnalytics | Mid-market friendly, published pricing | Companies at your size wanting a solid regression-based tool" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, scale prompt, first choice)

## What the models said about Aeqium

- "Tools requiring heavy analyst intervention (e.g., certain configurations of Aeqium, Figures)" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt, soft negative)
- "are quote-only and do not publish prices" (Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt, soft negative)
- "I'd choose Aeqium for the best balance of analysis depth, reporting traceability, and fit for mid-market HR analytics teams" (Perplexity Sonar, direct prompt, first choice)
- "Aeqium being a top choice for its comprehensive features" (Mistral Small, direct prompt, first choice)

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category. Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category. Published under CC BY 4.0; the output is the models' output, and nothing here is a recommendation by the index.